Publication Ethic

The statement of the scientific code of ethics in the Journal of Management and Culture is a statement of the code of ethics for all parties involved in the scientific journal publication process, namely managers (Managers), editors, reviewers, and authors (Authors). The code of ethics statement is stipulated to maintain the quality of the manuscript and avoid publishing violations and plagiarism in the process of publishing scientific publications that refer to the provisions of scientific publication ethics by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and LIPI Head Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Scientific Publication Code of Ethics, which In essence, this Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications upholds three ethical values in publication, namely (i) Neutrality, namely freedom from conflicts of interest in publication management; (ii) Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled to be writers; and (iii) Honesty, namely free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

Journal Manager Duties

1. Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity, and accreditation if necessary.

2. Determine the membership of the editorial board.

3. Defines the relationship between publishers, editors, reviewers, and other parties to a contract.

4. Respect confidentiality, both from people who have contributed and authors, editors, and reviewers.

5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyrights.

6. Conduct journal policy reviews and submit them to authors, editorial board, reviewers, and readers.

7. Create code of conduct guides for editors and reviewers.

8. Publish the journal regularly.

9. Guarantee the availability of funding sources for the continuation of journal publication.

10. Build a network of cooperation and marketing.

11. Prepare permits and other legal aspects.

Editor's Task

1. The decision to publish articles by the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal is responsible for deciding which articles to send to journals that must be published.

2. The Editorial Leader is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and is subject to legal requirements regarding copyright and plagiarism.

3. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this final decision. Manuscripts should be evaluated solely on the basis of their intellectual value without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, or nationality of the author.

4. Editorials and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers. Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used by anyone viewing the manuscript (when handling it) in his own research without the express written consent of the author.

Reviewer’s Task

1. Peer reviews assist the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board in making editorial decisions, while editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

2. Selected reviewers who feel unqualified to review their assigned manuscripts or are unable to provide a review, should notify the editor immediately and excuse themselves from the review process. Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be displayed or discussed with anyone except with the Chief Editor's permission.

3. Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

4. Standards of Objectivity Review must be carried out objectively. There will be no personal criticism from the author. Reviewers must clearly state their views with supporting arguments.

5. Sources Acknowledgments Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statements previously reported elsewhere must be accompanied by relevant citations.

6. Reviewers should also bring to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief/Editorial Board any similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

7. Acknowledgment Reviewers who have a conflict of interest may not review manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Author assignment

1) Standard original research report (manuscript): Authors must provide an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately presented in reports. Papers must contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to copy the work.

2) Data Access and Retention; Authors may be asked to provide raw data regarding d with papers for editorial review, and shall be prepared to grant public access to them, where possible, and shall in any case be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

3) Originality and Plagiarism; Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others, these must be properly cited or quoted.

4) Multiple and Concurrent Publication; An author generally should not publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

5) Source acknowledgment; Proper recognition of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported. Authors of papers should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the study being reported. Everyone who has made a significant contribution must be listed as a co-author. If other people have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

6) Disclosure and Conflict of Interest; All authors must disclose in their text any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that could be construed to influence the outcome or their interpretation of the text. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published work When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor of the journal or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Copyright Notice

Authors who send their articles to be published in this Journal agree with the following conditions:

1) The author retains copyright, and grants first publication rights to the Journal with the work concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors may make separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3) This journal has a CC-BY-SA license or its equivalent as an optimal license for the publication, distribution, use and reuse of scientific work.

4) In developing its strategy and setting priorities, the Journal recognizes that free access is a better option than paid access under CC-BY-SA or equivalent better than free under a different and more restrictive open license.

Privacy Statement

The names and e-mail addresses entered on this website will only be used for the purposes stated, will not be misused for other purposes or for distribution to other parties.