Peer Review Process

Peer reviewers have the right to provide some feedback to authors to encourage the quality of published manuscripts and editors for making editorial policy decisions according to their respective expertise.


The peer reviewer must notify the editor of his willingness to review the manuscript to be published. If it is not acceptable, the peer reviewer must notify the editor.


The manuscript under review is a confidential document. Do not communicate with other parties without the author's permission.

Standard Objectivity

Peer reviewers must adhere to the principles of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of scriptwriters during the review process. All comments must be accompanied by clear and supportive suggestions.

Clarity Reference

It is recommended that peer reviewers provide research authors with relevant literature, or case studies that have not been cited, have substantial similarities or overlap with the manuscripts being reviewed.

Conflict of interest

a. Peer reviewers are not permitted to use unpublished manuscript material for personal use without
    the written consent of the author, under any circumstances.
b. The information and ideas contained in the manuscripts reviewed are confidential and may not be
    distributed or used for personal gain.
c. If you have a conflict of interest for reasons of competition, collaboration, or other relationship with
    the author, institution or company involved in the publication, the peer reviewer is not permitted to
    evaluate the relevant manuscript.