Peer reviewers have the right to provide feedback to authors to improve the quality of published manuscripts, which is essential for editorial decision-making within their respective areas of expertise.

Consent: Peer reviewers must inform the editor of their willingness to review a manuscript for publication. If they are unwilling to do so, they must notify the editor.

Confidentiality: Manuscripts under review are confidential documents. Communication with other parties without the author's permission is prohibited.

Standards of objectivity: Peer reviewers must adhere to the principles of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of the authors during the review process. All comments must be accompanied by clear and supporting suggestions.

Clarity of References: Peer reviewers are encouraged to provide authors with information about relevant uncited literature or case studies that are substantially similar to or overlap with the manuscript under review.

Conflict of interest

Peer reviewers are not permitted to use unpublished manuscript materials for personal use without the author's written consent under any circumstances.

Information and ideas contained in peer-reviewed manuscripts are confidential and may not be distributed or used for personal advantage.

Peer reviewers who have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, institutions, or companies involved in the publication are not permitted to evaluate the manuscript.