Pernyataan kode etik ilmiah pada Jurnal Alifbata: Pendidikan Dasar merupakan pernyataan kode etik bagi seluruh pihak yang terlibat dalam proses penerbitan jurnal ilmiah, yaitu pengelola, editor, reviewer, dan penulis. Pernyataan kode etik ini disusun untuk menjaga kualitas naskah dan menghindari pelanggaran publikasi serta plagiarisme dalam proses penerbitan publikasi ilmiah yang mengacu pada ketentuan etika publikasi ilmiah oleh Komite Etika Publikasi (COPE), dan Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etik Publikasi Ilmiah, yang pada intinya Kode Etik Publikasi Ilmiah pada hakikatnya menjunjung tinggi tiga nilai etika dalam publikasi, yaitu (i) Kenetralan, yaitu bebas dari benturan kepentingan dalam pengelolaan publikasi; (ii) Keadilan, yaitu memberikan hak kepengarangan kepada yang berhak menjadi penulis; dan (iii) Kejujuran, yaitu bebas dari duplikasi, fabrikasi, pemalsuan dan plagiarisme dalam publikasi.

Plagiarism Rules

Untuk memvalidasi artikel yang dikirimkan, tim redaksi melakukan pemeriksaan silang naskah di Google Scholar dan juga menggunakan Turnitin plagiarism software.

Publishing Ethics Guidelines

The publication of articles in ALIFBATA: Journal of Basic Education is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The articles reviewed support and contain the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on the standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in publishing, namely: authors, journal editors, publishers, publishers and the public.

Islamic Religious Higher School of Darul Kamal NW Kembang Kerang as publisher of ALIFBATA: Journal of Basic Education is responsible for overseeing all stages of publication seriously and recognizing ethical and other responsibilities. Apart from being committed to ensuring that reprints and other commercial revenues do not have an impact or influence on editorial decisions, the institution is also committed to assisting communication with journal managers and/or other publishers if deemed useful and necessary.

Publishing Decisions: The editors of ALIFBATA: Journal of Basic Education are responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should be published. Validation of the work and its significance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors can be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and are limited by legal provisions that must be enforced regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may consult with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment: Editors always assess manuscripts based on their intellectual content without distinction of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author, expert editors, publishers and publishers.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Review partners' assessments assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors improve their writing.

Speed: Any selected reviewer who feels he is not qualified to assess the research reported in a manuscript or knows that rapid review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the assessment process.

Confidentiality: Any manuscript received for assessment must be treated as a confidential document. The document may not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objectivity Standard: Assessments must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not permitted. Assessors should state their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources: Assessors should identify relevant published work that is not cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been reported previously should be accompanied by relevant citations. An assessor should also ask the editor to pay attention to similarities or overlaps between the manuscript being assessed and other published writings.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest: Confidential information or opinions obtained through bestari partner assessments must be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Appraisers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any author, company, or institution associated with the writing.

Reporting Standards: Authors must present an accurate report of the work created and an objective discussion about its significance. Basic data must be represented accurately in writing. A piece of writing should include enough detail and references to allow others to repeat the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original works, and that they have cited properly if they use the work and/or words of others.

Multiple, Repeated or Concurrent Publications: An author generally may not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Source Acknowledgment: Fair acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Authorship: Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. All people who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. If there are other people who participated in certain important aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Notification and Conflicts of Interest: All authors must notify in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts that might allegedly influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works: If an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the article.